The Ann Arbor
Opinion
I think that the proof, including that taken in this court, leaves the question of fact doubtful, whether the tubs of butter claimed not to have been delivered at the port of destination, were shipped upon the canal-boat at Rome, as averred in the libel. The proof is too doubtful to found a decree upon it for the libel-lants. I am, also, inclined to think that the canal-boat is not a ship or vessel, upon the North river, or other navigable waters within the admiralty jurisdiction, subject to maritime liens in the admiralty, for breaches of contracts of affreightment. These boats are exclusively adapted to canal navigation. Of themselves, they have no power as respects navigation upon public waters, any more than a raft, an ark, or a mud-scow.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 F. Cas. 946 (The Ann Arbor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.