The Amelia

1 F. Cas. 595, 18 Leg. Int. 357, 4 Phila. 412, 1861 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 F. Cas. 595 (The Amelia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Amelia, 1 F. Cas. 595, 18 Leg. Int. 357, 4 Phila. 412, 1861 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43 (E.D. Pa. 1861).

Opinion

BY THE COUBT.

The prize master is mistaken in supposing that the persons mentioned in the above statement are subject to the order of the court On the contrary, they are in custody of the naval captors, unless they have been duly discharged. The court cannot interfere to direct their discharge. But if the commissioner of the court and the prize master concur in opinion that there is no reason for their longer detention, the court cannot perceive that their discharge would be censurable. This, however, is a matter for naval,’’and not for judicial regulation. The prize master, stating that his duties may require him to leave Philadelphia, the court add, that so soon as the persons in his custody shall have ‘been discharged, or their custody otherwise regulated by the proper naval authority, the court perceive no necessity for his remaining here longer. But so far as naval duties may be concerned, the prize master will, in this respect, judge for himself what should be his course of conduct

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Al-Quraishi v. Nakhla
728 F. Supp. 2d 702 (D. Maryland, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. Cas. 595, 18 Leg. Int. 357, 4 Phila. 412, 1861 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-amelia-paed-1861.