The Algeria

Third Circuit

The Algeria

162 F. 1006, 87 C.C.A. 674, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4519

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1908

DocketNo. 28

StatusPublished

This text of 162 F. 1006 (The Algeria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Algeria, 162 F. 1006, 87 C.C.A. 674, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4519 (3d Cir. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This cause is before us upon appeals taken by the steamship Algeria and the tug Majestic, respondents below, from the decree of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in admiralty, wherein both respondents were found to be at fault for a collision between the steamship and a tow of barges which the tug had in charge, and the damages'«resulting from which to the barges Ellen S. Jennings and Bailey were ordered to be divided equally between said respondents. After a careful consideration of the voluminous and somewhat conflicting evidence disclosed by the record, and of the elaborate arguments and briefs of the libelant’s and respondents respectively, we'cannot do otherwise than adopt the findings of fact made by the court below in its opinion, and the conclusions founded thereon. See 155 Fed. 902. The decree of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This cause is before us upon appeals taken by the steamship Algeria and the tug Majestic, respondents below, from the decree of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in admiralty, wherein both respondents were found to be at fault for a collision between the steamship and a tow of barges which the tug had in charge, and the damages'«resulting from which to the barges Ellen S. Jennings and Bailey were ordered to be divided equally between said respondents. After a careful consideration of the voluminous and somewhat conflicting evidence disclosed by the record, and of the elaborate arguments and briefs of the libelant’s and respondents respectively, we'cannot do otherwise than adopt the findings of fact made by the court below in its opinion, and the conclusions founded thereon. See 155 Fed. 902. The decree of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 F. 1006, 87 C.C.A. 674, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-algeria-ca3-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack