The Alexander McDougall

Second Circuit

The Alexander McDougall

279 F. 899, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1637

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 1922

DocketNo. 159

StatusPublished

This text of 279 F. 899 (The Alexander McDougall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Alexander McDougall, 279 F. 899, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1637 (2d Cir. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

The facts have been fully and ably considered in the opinic n of Hazel, District Judge, 279 Fed. 895. On consideration of the record we believe that that opinion sufficiently shows that libelant has not shown by a fair preponderance of evidence that tiie grounding of its steamer was caused b 7 any negligence on the part of the vessels proceeded against, or either of them. ' .

Deer.ee affirmed, with costs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

The facts have been fully and ably considered in the opinic n of Hazel, District Judge, 279 Fed. 895. On consideration of the record we believe that that opinion sufficiently shows that libelant has not shown by a fair preponderance of evidence that tiie grounding of its steamer was caused b 7 any negligence on the part of the vessels proceeded against, or either of them. ' .

Deer.ee affirmed, with costs

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 F. 899, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-alexander-mcdougall-ca2-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack