The Alexander McDougall

Second Circuit

The Alexander McDougall

279 F. 899, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1637

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 26, 1922·No. No. 159·Published

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

The facts have been fully and ably considered in the opinic n of Hazel, District Judge, 279 Fed. 895. On consideration of the record we believe that that opinion sufficiently shows that libelant has not shown by a fair preponderance of evidence that tiie grounding of its steamer was caused b 7 any negligence on the part of the vessels proceeded against, or either of them. ' .

Deer.ee affirmed, with costs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

The facts have been fully and ably considered in the opinic n of Hazel, District Judge, 279 Fed. 895. On consideration of the record we believe that that opinion sufficiently shows that libelant has not shown by a fair preponderance of evidence that tiie grounding of its steamer was caused b 7 any negligence on the part of the vessels proceeded against, or either of them. ' .

Deer.ee affirmed, with costs

The Alexander McDougall, 279 F. 899, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1637 (2d Cir. 1922).

Pincite

279 F. 899 (The Alexander McDougall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related