The Adriatic

Third Circuit

The Adriatic

192 F. 1022, 112 C.C.A. 665, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4908

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 1911

DocketNos. 63, 64 (1,543)

StatusPublished

This text of 192 F. 1022 (The Adriatic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Adriatic, 192 F. 1022, 112 C.C.A. 665, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4908 (3d Cir. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are cross-appeals from the decree of the District Court of the United. States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, entered in favor of libelant for $1,109.72, to cover one-half of the libelant’s damages and -costs, caused by the negligence of respondent’s tug Adriatic while assisting and taking libelant’s steamship Olaf Kyrre out of the dock into the stream from one of the piers in the port of Philadelphia. A careful examination of all the testimony brought up by these appeals and the findings of fact by the learned judge of the court below convinces us that there was no error in the conclusion that “the damage caused by the accident was the result of the combined fault of the tug and the master of the steamship, so that each should be responsible for one-half the damages and costs. The decree of the court below (183 Fed. 867) is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are cross-appeals from the decree of the District Court of the United. States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, entered in favor of libelant for $1,109.72, to cover one-half of the libelant’s damages and -costs, caused by the negligence of respondent’s tug Adriatic while assisting and taking libelant’s steamship Olaf Kyrre out of the dock into the stream from one of the piers in the port of Philadelphia. A careful examination of all the testimony brought up by these appeals and the findings of fact by the learned judge of the court below convinces us that there was no error in the conclusion that “the damage caused by the accident was the result of the combined fault of the tug and the master of the steamship, so that each should be responsible for one-half the damages and costs. The decree of the court below (183 Fed. 867) is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 F. 1022, 112 C.C.A. 665, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-adriatic-ca3-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack