the Accounts Retrievable System, Inc. Assignee of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N. A. Successor Om Interest to Bank One Delaware, N.A. v. Wei Chin Lin and Bank of America, N.A.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 16, 2019
Docket05-19-00354-CV
StatusPublished

This text of the Accounts Retrievable System, Inc. Assignee of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N. A. Successor Om Interest to Bank One Delaware, N.A. v. Wei Chin Lin and Bank of America, N.A. (the Accounts Retrievable System, Inc. Assignee of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N. A. Successor Om Interest to Bank One Delaware, N.A. v. Wei Chin Lin and Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the Accounts Retrievable System, Inc. Assignee of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N. A. Successor Om Interest to Bank One Delaware, N.A. v. Wei Chin Lin and Bank of America, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Order entered August 16, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00354-CV

THE ACCOUNTS RETRIEVABLE SYSTEM, INC. ASSIGNEE OF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N. A. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK ONE DELAWARE, N.A., Appellant

V.

WEI CHIN LIN AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-03587-B

ORDER The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared appellee Bank of

America, N.A.’s request for attorney’s fees remains pending and the trial court did not sign an

order on the agreed motion for nonsuit filed by appellant and Bank of America. See Lehmann v.

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (generally, appellate courts have jurisdiction

only over appeals from final judgments). As requested, appellant filed a letter addressing the

Court’s concern. In its letter brief, appellant asks that, if the Court determines the order is not

final, that we abate this appeal and “instruct the trial court to sign a final order granting” the

agreed motion for nonsuit. We treat appellant’s notice of appeal as prematurely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.1(a).

Appellant has thirty days from the date of this order to obtain an order on the agreed motion for

nonsuit. If the trial court signs such an order, appellant shall have filed a supplemental clerk’s

record containing the order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable

Melissa Bellan, Presiding Judge of County Court at Law No. 2, and all parties.

We ABATE this appeal. The appeal will be reinstated in thirty-five days from the date

of this order.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the Accounts Retrievable System, Inc. Assignee of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N. A. Successor Om Interest to Bank One Delaware, N.A. v. Wei Chin Lin and Bank of America, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-accounts-retrievable-system-inc-assignee-of-chase-manhattan-bank-usa-texapp-2019.