The A. C. Cheney

Second Circuit

The A. C. Cheney

111 F. 1004, 49 C.C.A. 669, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4454

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 1901

DocketNo. 39

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. 1004 (The A. C. Cheney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The A. C. Cheney, 111 F. 1004, 49 C.C.A. 669, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4454 (2d Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no satisfactory evidence of any careless or negligent conduct on the part of the tug while performing the towage service, and the case for the libelant rests wholly upon the presumption arising from the fracture of the planks during the service. We are not satisfied that the court below erred in the conclusion reached, and think the decreo dismissing the libel ought not to be disturbed. Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no satisfactory evidence of any careless or negligent conduct on the part of the tug while performing the towage service, and the case for the libelant rests wholly upon the presumption arising from the fracture of the planks during the service. We are not satisfied that the court below erred in the conclusion reached, and think the decreo dismissing the libel ought not to be disturbed. Decree affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F. 1004, 49 C.C.A. 669, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-a-c-cheney-ca2-1901.