Thayermahan Inc. v. Atlantic Oceanic LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 9, 2026
Docket1:26-cv-03702
StatusUnknown

This text of Thayermahan Inc. v. Atlantic Oceanic LLC (Thayermahan Inc. v. Atlantic Oceanic LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thayermahan Inc. v. Atlantic Oceanic LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X : THAYERMAHAN INC., : Petitioner, : 26 Civ. 3702 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER ATLANTIC OCEANIC LLC, : Respondent. : ------------------------------------------------------------- X

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on May 5, 2026, Petitioner commenced this action seeking to confirm two arbitration awards issued in a consolidated arbitration proceeding. WHEREAS, Respondent has not appeared or filed a response to the Petition, and on June 5, 2026, the Clerk’s Office entered a certificate of default as to Respondent. WHEREAS, a conference was held on June 8, 2026, to discuss Petitioner’s June 4, 2026, emergency motion seeking confirmation of the arbitration awards, entry of default judgment against Respondent and lifting of the automatic stay imposed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(a) (the “Emergency Motion”). WHEREAS, Respondent did not appear at the conference. As discussed at the conference, it is hereby ORDERED that in Petitioner’s filing in further support of the Emergency Motion due June 11, 2026, Petitioner shall address the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction over the Petition’s request to confirm the BREEZE Final Award. Petitioner may also supplement the Petition as necessary or helpful for its consideration as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. See D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 110 (2d Cir. 2006); Bailey Shipping, Ltd. v. Am. Bureau of Shipping, 431 F. Supp. 3d 359, 364-65 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Petitioner should not simply reiterate its previously made arguments. It is further ORDERED that the requirement of a Local Civil Rule 56.1 statement of material facts is waived, given the nature of this action. Dated: June 9, 2026 New York, New York

LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener
462 F.3d 95 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thayermahan Inc. v. Atlantic Oceanic LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thayermahan-inc-v-atlantic-oceanic-llc-nysd-2026.