Thayer v. Van Vleet
5 Johns. 111
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict; and the fact of the justice going to the jury and answering the question of law put to him, is not an irregularity for which the verdict ought to be set aside. There was in this case no semblance of abuse; and the consent of the parties may be inferred.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thayer v. Van Vleet, 5 Johns. 111 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
5 Johns. 111 (Thayer v. Van Vleet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenss v. Harrod
100 Misc. 624 (New York County Courts, 1917)
Lasher v. Curry
68 N.Y.S. 845 (New York County Courts, 1901)
Galloway v. Corbitt
18 N.W. 218 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Wiggins v. Downer
67 How. Pr. 65 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Read v. City of Cambridge
124 Mass. 567 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)
Gillotte v. Jackson
41 Jones & S. 308 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1876)
Schappner v. Second Avenue Railroad
55 Barb. 497 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)
Hancock v. Salmon
8 Barb. 564 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)