Thayer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Thayer v. State

1929 OK CR 150, 276 P. 1118, 42 Okla. Crim. 372, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 20, 1929

DocketNo. A-6650.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 150 (Thayer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thayer v. State, 1929 OK CR 150, 276 P. 1118, 42 Okla. Crim. 372, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in ■ error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county on a charge of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at three years in the state penitentiary.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant and one McAlpine burglarized a store building belonging to B. W. Taylor in the town of Choctaw. The evidence amply sustains the verdict and judgment. The judgment was entered in December, 1926, and the appeal was lodged in this court in June, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. No jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in ■ error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county on a charge of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at three years in the state penitentiary.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant and one McAlpine burglarized a store building belonging to B. W. Taylor in the town of Choctaw. The evidence amply sustains the verdict and judgment. The judgment was entered in December, 1926, and the appeal was lodged in this court in June, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. No jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 150, 276 P. 1118, 42 Okla. Crim. 372, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thayer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.