Thayer v. Rogers

New York Supreme Court

Thayer v. Rogers

1 Johns. Cas. 152

DecidedOctober 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 152 (Thayer v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thayer v. Rogers, 1 Johns. Cas. 152 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Every matter of defence that can be admitted under the first plea, may be given in evidence under the second. The first is, therefore, useless, and is ordered to be. struck out. ' ■

Note. The defendant also pleaded four other pleas, some of which the plaintiff also moved to strike out;' but [*153] *the defence appearing to be complicated, and the propriety of the pleas demanding a close examination, the. court did riot think it a -case sufficiently clear to discriminate between them, and interfere in this, peremptory manner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Every matter of defence that can be admitted under the first plea, may be given in evidence under the second. The first is, therefore, useless, and is ordered to be. struck out. ' ■

Note. The defendant also pleaded four other pleas, some of which the plaintiff also moved to strike out;' but [*153] *the defence appearing to be complicated, and the propriety of the pleas demanding a close examination, the. court did riot think it a -case sufficiently clear to discriminate between them, and interfere in this, peremptory manner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. Cas. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thayer-v-rogers-nysupct-1799.