Thayer v. Brock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thayer v. Brock

54 A.D.2d 900, 387 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 900 (Thayer v. Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thayer v. Brock, 54 A.D.2d 900, 387 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia for an accounting, plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 6, 1976, as granted defendant’s motion for a protective order and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated March 19, 1976, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination made as to defendant’s motion. Appeal from the order dated January 6, 1976 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated March 19, 1976 affirmed insofar as appealed from (see Krauss v Putterman, 51 AD2d 551, 552; Alderman v Eagle, 41 AD2d 641; Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of Church of Holy Trinity, Brooklyn v Munsell, 11 AD2d 698, 699). Defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia for an accounting, plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 6, 1976, as granted defendant’s motion for a protective order and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated March 19, 1976, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination made as to defendant’s motion. Appeal from the order dated January 6, 1976 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated March 19, 1976 affirmed insofar as appealed from (see Krauss v Putterman, 51 AD2d 551, 552; Alderman v Eagle, 41 AD2d 641; Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of Church of Holy Trinity, Brooklyn v Munsell, 11 AD2d 698, 699). Defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 900, 387 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thayer-v-brock-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack