Thaw, Gopman & Associates, P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A.
This text of 595 So. 2d 305 (Thaw, Gopman & Associates, P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the order denying the motion to vacate default filed by defendants Thaw, Gopman & Assoc., P.A., and Ronald Thaw. Under the circumstances of this case, the submission of motions to modify a stay and to dismiss the complaint instead of an answer as provided in the trial court’s order does not merit entry of a default. Joseph v. Marese, 534 So.2d 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Techno Indus. Corp. v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 410 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 So. 2d 305, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3839, 1992 WL 55259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thaw-gopman-associates-pa-v-jack-j-greenberg-md-associates-fladistctapp-1992.