Thau v. Fitzer
This text of 69 A.D.2d 800 (Thau v. Fitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition unanimously granted, order of contempt, entered December 4, 1978, and the sentence imposed on petitioner, vacated, without costs or disbursements. Although the remarks by counsel could be considered provocative, nevertheless, on the record before us, we find insufficient support for the conclusion that petitioner’s continued questioning of a witness in the circumstances of the evidentiary issue before the court was either "disorderly”, "insolent”, or "willful” as required by section 750 of the Judiciary Law. Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Bloom and Lane, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.2d 800, 415 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thau-v-fitzer-nyappdiv-1979.