Thatcher's Requisition

18 Pa. Super. 533, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 236
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 16, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 Pa. Super. 533 (Thatcher's Requisition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thatcher's Requisition, 18 Pa. Super. 533, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 236 (Pa. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It is unnecessary at this time to express an opinion upon the question whether an appeal lies from the order referred to in the petition. It is sufficient for present purposes to say that even if an appeal does lie, our jurisdiction on appeal must necessarily be confined to an examination of the regularity and legality of the proceedings brought up by the certiorari and cannot be extended to an examination of the evidence adduced at the hearing or to the rulings of the judge upon questions of evidence. In saying this we are not to be understood as intimating that the rulings complained of were erroneous.

The motion for an order of supersedeas is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Bentz
22 Pa. D. & C. 132 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Commonwealth v. Hare
36 Pa. Super. 125 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Commonwealth v. Superintendent of County Prison
33 Pa. Super. 594 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Pa. Super. 533, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thatchers-requisition-pasuperct-1901.