Thatcher v. Bellows

13 Mass. 111
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1816
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Mass. 111 (Thatcher v. Bellows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thatcher v. Bellows, 13 Mass. 111 (Mass. 1816).

Opinion

Curia.

There is no doubt in our minds on the construction ot ¡.he agreement in this policy, respecting the claim and prosecution of an appeal in case of capture. The assured undertook to make the claim and to prosecute the appeal of themselves ; and their right to recover of the underwriters .depended upon their performance of this agreement. The underwriters were to contribute to the expense. But the expense was first to be incurred, or at least the foundation [96]*96of it should have been laid by an actual claim. There is no excuse for the neglect to file a claim. It was not the business of the underwriters to give the necessary bond, or to advance any part of the sum of money required. They undertook to indemnify for this, * in addition to the principal loss, if there should be a final condemnation ; and to contribute towards this expense, if there should be an acquittal.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Mass. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thatcher-v-bellows-mass-1816.