Tharpe v. State

303 So. 2d 648, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8335
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tharpe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 1974·No. No. U-257·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On August 6, 1971 appellant was placed on probation for two years. On July 23, 1973 his wife signed a complaint affidavit charging appellant with threatening her, harassing her, and firing a shot into her home. Two days later appellant was arrested for parole violation. He was also [649]*649charged with resisting arrest without violence. Appellant later signed a statement admitting that he had forged a check for $1,850.00. Following a hearing on rule to show cause the trial court concluded that appellant had violated the terms of his probation, whereupon probation was revoked and he was sentenced to four years in the State Prison. This appeal followed. As ground for reversal appellant asserts the identical point as was asserted in Sarles v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 294 So.2d 95, relying upon Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). We now respond sub judice as we did in Sarles, supra.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tharpe v. State, 303 So. 2d 648, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8335 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

303 So. 2d 648 (Tharpe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Gagnon v. Scarpelli
411 U.S. 778 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Sarles v. State
294 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)