Tharpe v. Gormley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Tharpe v. Gormley

168 S.E. 261, 176 Ga. 508, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 210

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 20, 1933

DocketNo. 9174

StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 261 (Tharpe v. Gormley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tharpe v. Gormley, 168 S.E. 261, 176 Ga. 508, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 210 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

This was not a suit for injunction or other equitable relief, nor was it a case involving any extraordinary remedy, and under the facts appearing the case does not otherwise fall within any class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Ga. L. 1916, p. 19 (Code, § 6502). It is therefore

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., disqualified. W. H. Harris and O. L. Shepard, for plaintiff. Park & Sirozier, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

This was not a suit for injunction or other equitable relief, nor was it a case involving any extraordinary remedy, and under the facts appearing the case does not otherwise fall within any class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Ga. L. 1916, p. 19 (Code, § 6502). It is therefore

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., disqualified. W. H. Harris and O. L. Shepard, for plaintiff. Park & Sirozier, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E. 261, 176 Ga. 508, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tharpe-v-gormley-ga-1933.