Tharpe v. Gormley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Tharpe v. Gormley

168 S.E. 261, 176 Ga. 508, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 210

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 20, 1933·No. No. 9174·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

This was not a suit for injunction or other equitable relief, nor was it a case involving any extraordinary remedy, and under the facts appearing the case does not otherwise fall within any class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Ga. L. 1916, p. 19 (Code, § 6502). It is therefore

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., disqualified. W. H. Harris and O. L. Shepard, for plaintiff. Park & Sirozier, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

This was not a suit for injunction or other equitable relief, nor was it a case involving any extraordinary remedy, and under the facts appearing the case does not otherwise fall within any class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Ga. L. 1916, p. 19 (Code, § 6502). It is therefore

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., disqualified. W. H. Harris and O. L. Shepard, for plaintiff. Park & Sirozier, for defendant.

Tharpe v. Gormley, 168 S.E. 261, 176 Ga. 508, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 210 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

168 S.E. 261 (Tharpe v. Gormley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.