Tharpe v. City of Birmingham
119 So. 594, 23 Ala. App. 23, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 27
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating a city ordinance, and appeals.
There is no assignment of errors, and the judgment is affirmed on motion of appellee. Creel v. Jasper (Ala. App.) 69 So. 239; Stadt v. Birmingham, 14 Ala. App. 667, 70 So. 972.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tharpe v. City of Birmingham, 119 So. 594, 23 Ala. App. 23, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 27 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).
119 So. 594 (Tharpe v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tharpe v. City of Birmingham
121 So. 918 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)