Tharp v. Commissioner of Social Security

N.D. Indiana

Tharp v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedFebruary 18, 2020

Docket3:18-cv-00878

StatusUnknown

This text of Tharp v. Commissioner of Social Security (Tharp v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tharp v. Commissioner of Social Security, (N.D. Ind. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA DEBRA T. 1, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. 3:18cv878 ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins, on January 29, 2020. This Report and Recommendation was submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection results in waiver of the right to challenge the Recommendation before either the District Court or the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leininger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994); The Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989); Lebovitz v. Miller, 856 F.2d 902, 905 n.2 (7th Cir. 1988). No objections were filed within the 14-day time limit. Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 1 For privacy purposes, Plaintiff’s full name will not be used in this Order. Conclusion As set forth in Magistrate Judge Collins’s Report and Recommendation, the Decision of the Commissioner is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

Entered: February 14, 2020.

s/ William C. Lee William C. Lee, Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA DEBRA T. 1, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. 3:18cv878 ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins, on January 29, 2020. This Report and Recommendation was submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection results in waiver of the right to challenge the Recommendation before either the District Court or the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leininger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994); The Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989); Lebovitz v. Miller, 856 F.2d 902, 905 n.2 (7th Cir. 1988). No objections were filed within the 14-day time limit. Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 1 For privacy purposes, Plaintiff’s full name will not be used in this Order. Conclusion As set forth in Magistrate Judge Collins’s Report and Recommendation, the Decision of the Commissioner is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

Entered: February 14, 2020.

s/ William C. Lee William C. Lee, Judge United States District Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tharp v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tharp-v-commissioner-of-social-security-innd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack