Thares v. So. Dak. Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court, D. South Dakota
DecidedJune 16, 2021
Docket4:21-cv-04107
StatusUnknown

This text of Thares v. So. Dak. Department of Corrections (Thares v. So. Dak. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thares v. So. Dak. Department of Corrections, (D.S.D. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i □□ DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA | . _ SOUTHERN DIVISION .

GARY L. THARES, 4:21-CV-04107-RAL

. Plaintiff, : . VS. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SO. DAK. DEPARTMENT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN CORRECTIONS, IN ITS OFFICIAL FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING. CAPACITY; MIKE LEIDHOLT, SECRETARY | PLAINTIFF TO PAY AN INTIAL PARTIAL OF CORRECTIONS, IN HIS OFFICIAL FILING FEE CAPACITY; CATHERINE SCHLIMGEN, - . ATTORNEY, SD DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; MEDICAL STAFF, MIKE DURFEE STATE | PRISON, IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND B. | MUDDER, . □ Defendants.

Plaintiff Gary L. Thares filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. □□

Thares moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 2. Under the Prison Litigation □ Reform Act, a prisoner who “brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis...shallbe required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). “When an inmate seeks

pauper status, the only issue is whether the inmate pays the entire fee at the initiationofthe proceedings or over a period of time under an installment plan.” Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 1997) (quoting McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1997)).

The initial partial filing fee that accompanies an installment plan is calculated according to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), which requires a payment of 20 percent of the greater of:

(A) _ the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account; or

(B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal. Thares reported an average monthly balance for the past six months in his prisoner trust account of $77.67, and average monthly deposits of $89.17. Doc. 3 at 1. Based on this information, the Court grants Thares leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but he must pay an initial partial filing fee of $17.83 (20 percent of his average monthly deposits). Thares must pay the initial partial filing fee of $17.83 by July 16, 2021. Failure to pay the filing fee by July 16, 2021, will result in dismissal without prejudice of Thares’s complaint. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Thares’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 2, is granted. Thares must make a payment of $17.83 by July 16, 2021, made payable to the Clerk, USS. District Court. If Thares does not pay the initial partial filing fee by July 16, 2021, his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. The court will conduct a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A screening after Thares pays his initial partial filing fee. It is finally ORDERED that the institution having custody of Thares is directed that whenever the amount in Thares’s trust account, exclusive of funds available to him in his frozen account, exceeds $10.00, monthly payments that equal 20 percent of the funds credited the preceding month to Thares’s trust account shall be forwarded to the U.S. District Court Clerk’s Office under to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. DATED June 16%, 2021.

BY THE COURT:

ROBERTO A. fe CHIEF JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thares v. So. Dak. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thares-v-so-dak-department-of-corrections-sdd-2021.