Thanh-Thuy Thi Le v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Trustee For Morgan Stanley Abs Capital 1 Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thanh-Thuy Thi Le v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Trustee For Morgan Stanley Abs Capital 1 Inc.

264 So. 3d 1007

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 2018

DocketCase No. 2D17-2959

StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 1007 (Thanh-Thuy Thi Le v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Trustee For Morgan Stanley Abs Capital 1 Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thanh-Thuy Thi Le v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Trustee For Morgan Stanley Abs Capital 1 Inc., 264 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se, challenges (1) the trial court's order denying her motion *1008for relief from a 2014 foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company in August 2014, (2) the trial court's order denying rehearing of its denial of the motion for relief from judgment, and (3) the trial court's order granting the bank's motion to reset the foreclosure sale. We affirm the denials of the motion to vacate and the motion for rehearing without further comment. And we dismiss the portion of this appeal that attempts to challenge the order resetting the foreclosure sale as it is not an appealable order. See Pridgen v. First Union Bank, 879 So.2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order. Rather, it is a purely administrative, interlocutory step in the judicial sales process.").

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se, challenges (1) the trial court's order denying her motion *1008for relief from a 2014 foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company in August 2014, (2) the trial court's order denying rehearing of its denial of the motion for relief from judgment, and (3) the trial court's order granting the bank's motion to reset the foreclosure sale. We affirm the denials of the motion to vacate and the motion for rehearing without further comment. And we dismiss the portion of this appeal that attempts to challenge the order resetting the foreclosure sale as it is not an appealable order. See Pridgen v. First Union Bank, 879 So.2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order. Rather, it is a purely administrative, interlocutory step in the judicial sales process.").

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 So. 3d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thanh-thuy-thi-le-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-company-as-trustee-for-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack