Thanh Huu Nguyen and Anh Thi Tram Vo v. Joshua Kessler and Jessica Kessler
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00470-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
THANH HUU NGUYEN AND ANH THI TRAM VO, Appellants,
v.
JOSHUA KESSLER AND JESSICA KESSLER Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law of Guadalupe County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria This cause is before the Court on appellants’ voluntary motion to dismiss and
appellees’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 1 Appellees assert the underlying trial
court has not disposed of all pending parties and claims.
In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review
final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. Har-
Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order
subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).
Accordingly, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED
FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
NORA L. LONGORIA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 21st day of January, 2021.
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, pursuant to docket equalization order Misc. Docket No. 20-9117 issued by the Supreme Court of Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thanh Huu Nguyen and Anh Thi Tram Vo v. Joshua Kessler and Jessica Kessler (Thanh Huu Nguyen and Anh Thi Tram Vo v. Joshua Kessler and Jessica Kessler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.