Thames v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Thames v. State

163 S.W.2d 408, 144 Tex. Crim. 398, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 24, 1942

DocketNo. 22237.

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.W.2d 408 (Thames v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thames v. State, 163 S.W.2d 408, 144 Tex. Crim. 398, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

*399 No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court to consider the appeal. See Art. 827, C. C. P., and cases cited under said articles in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3, p. 197.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

*399 No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court to consider the appeal. See Art. 827, C. C. P., and cases cited under said articles in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3, p. 197.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.W.2d 408, 144 Tex. Crim. 398, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thames-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.