Thames v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Thames v. State

163 S.W.2d 408, 144 Tex. Crim. 398, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thames v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Tex. Crim. 111 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 24, 1942·No. No. 22237.·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

*399 No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court to consider the appeal. See Art. 827, C. C. P., and cases cited under said articles in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3, p. 197.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

*399 No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court to consider the appeal. See Art. 827, C. C. P., and cases cited under said articles in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3, p. 197.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Thames v. State, 163 S.W.2d 408, 144 Tex. Crim. 398, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

163 S.W.2d 408 (Thames v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.