Thames v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Thames v. State

14 So. 2d 258, 31 Ala. App. 226

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 22, 1943

Docket3 Div. 854.

StatusPublished

This text of 14 So. 2d 258 (Thames v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thames v. State, 14 So. 2d 258, 31 Ala. App. 226 (Ala. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of fifteen years. Code 1940, Tit. 14, § 38.

The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions. The record seems regular, in all respects.

Nothing is apparent demanding discussion, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of fifteen years. Code 1940, Tit. 14, § 38.

The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions. The record seems regular, in all respects.

Nothing is apparent demanding discussion, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 So. 2d 258, 31 Ala. App. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thames-v-state-alactapp-1943.