Thames v. State
137 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 690
Opinion
Defendants were indicted on a charge of grand larceny and on their trial convicted of petit larceny, and they appeal.
The record in this case has been read, and, after considering the whole record, we do not find 'any error affecting the substantial rights of the defendants to their prejudice and the judgment is affirmed. ‘
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thames v. State, 137 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 690 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
137 So. 926 (Thames v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.