Thames v. State
137 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 690
This text of 137 So. 926 (Thames v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thames v. State, 137 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 690 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Defendants were indicted on a charge of grand larceny and on their trial convicted of petit larceny, and they appeal.
The record in this case has been read, and, after considering the whole record, we do not find 'any error affecting the substantial rights of the defendants to their prejudice and the judgment is affirmed. ‘
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thames-v-state-alactapp-1931.