Thames v. State
109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thames v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 526 →
Opinion
Defendant was indicted and convicted of disturbing religious worship, and appeals. The evidence for the state tends to X>rove the charge as laid in the indictment. The policy of the law is to protect people gathered for religious worship from disturbances that interfere with the services. We find no error in this record that would justify a reversal of this case. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thames v. State, 109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
109 So. 926 (Thames v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.