Thames River Line v. Chester A. Poling, Inc.

73 F.2d 993, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2894, 1934 A.M.C. 1414
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 1934
DocketNo. 31
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.2d 993 (Thames River Line v. Chester A. Poling, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thames River Line v. Chester A. Poling, Inc., 73 F.2d 993, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2894, 1934 A.M.C. 1414 (2d Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deerees (6 F. Supp. 743) affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thames River Line v. Chester A. Poling, Inc.
6 F. Supp. 743 (E.D. New York, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.2d 993, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2894, 1934 A.M.C. 1414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thames-river-line-v-chester-a-poling-inc-ca2-1934.