Thallhimer v. Brinckerhoff

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Thallhimer v. Brinckerhoff

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 30

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 30 (Thallhimer v. Brinckerhoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thallhimer v. Brinckerhoff, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 30 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Errors reversed the decision of the Supreme Court which held it to he champerty, and decided, that the plaintiff might maintain assumpsit for money had and received to his use, and that the agreement was not tainted with champerty, and that the husband whose wife might, by possibility, be heir of one who claimed the land, might aid his brother-in-law in the maintai'nance of his suit upon an agreement to have a part of the land.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Errors reversed the decision of the Supreme Court which held it to he champerty, and decided, that the plaintiff might maintain assumpsit for money had and received to his use, and that the agreement was not tainted with champerty, and that the husband whose wife might, by possibility, be heir of one who claimed the land, might aid his brother-in-law in the maintai'nance of his suit upon an agreement to have a part of the land.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thallhimer-v-brinckerhoff-nycterr-1799.