Thal v. Polumbaum

New York Court of Appeals

Thal v. Polumbaum

103 N.E.2d 55, 303 N.Y. 686, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1107

New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking therefrom so much thereof as awards money damages against defendants George Ogens, doing business as Ansonia Sign Company, and Miracle Sell-It Sign Corp. and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. It was proper to grant this injunctive relief against all the defendants, but we see no basis in this record for a money judgment against defendants Ogens and Miracle, since there is nothing to show any connection of either of those defendants with the transaction or transactions involving the 3,565 “ Graybar ” signs. No opinion, intersection, and that such sign had not been replaced until

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye. Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by striking therefrom so much thereof as awards money damages against defendants George Ogens, doing business as Ansonia Sign Company, and Miracle Sell-It Sign Corp. and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. It was proper to grant this injunctive relief against all the defendants, but we see no basis in this record for a money judgment against defendants Ogens and Miracle, since there is nothing to show any connection of either of those defendants with the transaction or transactions involving the 3,565 “ Graybar ” signs. No opinion, intersection, and that such sign had not been replaced until

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye. Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

Thal v. Polumbaum, 103 N.E.2d 55, 303 N.Y. 686, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1107 (N.Y. 1951).

Pincite

103 N.E.2d 55 (Thal v. Polumbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related