Thaddeus Deshun Papillion v. the State of Texas
This text of Thaddeus Deshun Papillion v. the State of Texas (Thaddeus Deshun Papillion v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00073-CR __________________
THADDEUS DESHUN PAPILLION, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23DCCR0857 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Thaddeus Deshun Papillion was indicted for possession of a controlled
substance, a charge to which he pleaded guilty, and on July 9, 2025, the trial court
sentenced him to two years confinement in state jail. Papillion did not file a motion
for new trial within 30 days after the date on which the trial court imposed the
sentence. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on August
8, 2025. See id. 26.2(a)(1). Papillion’s time for filing a motion for extension of time
to perfect his appeal expired on August 25, 2025. See id. 4.1(a), 26.3. A pro se notice
1 of appeal was dated January 30, 2026, mailed in an envelope postmarked February
3, 2026, and received by the District Clerk on February 9, 2026.
On February 13, 2026, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that the
appeal had been filed outside the time for which an extension of time may be granted
for filing notice of appeal and warned the parties that the appeal would be dismissed
unless grounds were shown for continuing the appeal. Neither Papillion nor the State
responded to the Clerk’s notice.
When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to
file a notice of appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open
court. See id. 26.2(a). An appellate court may extend the time to file the notice of
appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the
defendant files a notice of appeal in the trial court and files a motion for extension
of time in the appellate court. See id. 26.3. Papillion failed to file a notice of appeal
and a motion for an extension of time within the time permitted by the rule. See id.
He does not contend that he has obtained an out-of-time appeal from the Court of
Criminal Appeals.
This Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely
filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
“Timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to hearing
an appeal.” Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). “If a
2 notice of appeal is not timely filed, the court of appeals has no option but to dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Id.
The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 31, 2026 Opinion Delivered April 1, 2026 Do Not Publish
Before Johnson, Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thaddeus Deshun Papillion v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thaddeus-deshun-papillion-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp9-2026.