Thaddeus C. Lewingdon, Darrell C. Ward Dale L. Slusher David Wernert Derek M. Byrd v. Richard F. Celeste Richard P. Seiter: Terry Morris Norris McMackin Robert Brumbaugh v. Richard F. Celeste: Richard P. Seiter Terry Morris
This text of 810 F.2d 201 (Thaddeus C. Lewingdon, Darrell C. Ward Dale L. Slusher David Wernert Derek M. Byrd v. Richard F. Celeste Richard P. Seiter: Terry Morris Norris McMackin Robert Brumbaugh v. Richard F. Celeste: Richard P. Seiter Terry Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
810 F.2d 201
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Thaddeus C. LEWINGDON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Darrell C. WARD; Dale L. Slusher; David Wernert; Derek M.
Byrd, Plaintiffs
v.
Richard F. CELESTE; Richard P. Seiter: Terry Morris;
Norris McMackin, Defendants-Appellees.
Robert BRUMBAUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard F. CELESTE: Richard P. Seiter; Terry Morris,
Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 86-3013, 86-3295.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 25, 1986.
Before GUY, Circuit Judge, PECK, Senior Circuit Judge, and EDGAR, District Judge.*
ORDER
These pro se plaintiffs appeal from district court judgments dismissing their suits filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs claimed they are being illegally confined because Ohio has never been lawfully admitted to the Union.
Upon review of the district court records in light of the arguments submitted by the parties in their respective appellate briefs, this Court concludes that the district court properly dismissed plaintiffs' suits for failure to state a claim of constitutional magnitude. Knoblauch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 749 F.2d 200, 201-02 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 95 (1985); see also Sisk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 791 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986).
This panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary in these appeals. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The district court's judgments are, accordingly, hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(d)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
The Honorable R. Allan Edgar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting be designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
810 F.2d 201, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thaddeus-c-lewingdon-darrell-c-ward-dale-l-slusher-david-wernert-derek-ca6-1986.