THACKER, BALLARD v. 567 PARTNERS, INC.

CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJuly 14, 2026
Docket2025-20-6098
StatusPublished

This text of THACKER, BALLARD v. 567 PARTNERS, INC. (THACKER, BALLARD v. 567 PARTNERS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
THACKER, BALLARD v. 567 PARTNERS, INC., (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

FILED Jul 14, 2026 07:52 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY

BALLARD THACKER, Docket No. 2025-20-6098 Employee, v. 567 PARTNERS, INC., State File No. 860304-2025 Employer, and FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL Judge Brian K. Addington INSURANCE CO., Carrier.

EXPEDITED ORDER

Ballard Thacker alleged a life-threatening infection after he scratched his leg while working for 567 Partners. 567 Partners denied the claim, asserting that Mr. Thacker was injured at home and recklessly worsened the non-work-related injury at work.

The Court held an expedited hearing on July 9, 2026, on his entitlement to medical and temporary disability benefits, and attorney fees. The Court finds that Mr. Thacker is likely to prevail at a compensation hearing that his injury is work- related and grants his request for medical benefits but denies the other requests.

Claim History

Mr. Thacker worked as a plumber for 567 Partners. He testified that as he descended stairs, he injured his left leg on a ladder a coworker carried on August 21, 2025. He notified his supervisor, who told him to rest, which Mr. Thacker did for 15-20 minutes. Mr. Thacker’s memory after the incident is hazy because he developed a severe infection that required extensive hospitalization. Although he worked on August 22, he did not work after that day.

The jobsite was very crowded, as coworkers who normally did not work 1 together were forced into one home on instructions from 567 Partners’ owner to finish the job that day. Although they were in tight quarters, they did not see each other all day, as their jobs had them working in different areas of the home at different times.

Robert Akins, a laborer, testified that Mr. Thacker, trying to avoid horseplay at the top of the stairs, bumped into him that day on the stairs but did not hit the ladder he was carrying. The next morning, Mr. Akins observed Mr. Thacker limping. He saw him push a pocketknife into his leg and pour cola on the wound as an antiseptic. Mr. Akins had not observed Mr. Thacker limping before the incident.

Cole Lester, lead gas plumber, also saw Mr. Thacker poke the knife into his leg and pour cola on the leg as he was walking past him the day after the incident. Before the August 21 incident, he overheard Mr. Thacker telling 567 Partners’ owner that he fell off his porch at home and injured his leg.

Neither Mr. Akins nor Mr. Lester testified as to which leg they observed Mr. Thacker poke with a knife.

Mr. Thacker sought medical treatment at a local hospital and was transferred to a regional hospital, where he came under the care of Dr. Kent Lord. Dr. Lord testified that, based on the history that Mr. Thacker gave him, the infection and hospitalization of his leg were caused by the bump at work. He also stated that his opinion might change if the facts changed. The parties did not ask Dr. Lord about the knife and cola incident.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Thacker must show a likelihood of proving at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025). The threshold question is whether he was injured at work. To prevail, Mr. Thacker must show that his injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment. He must prove a work-related incident or set of incidents identifiable by time and place of occurrence. Id. § 50-6-102(12)(A).

Based on the testimony of Mr. Thacker and Mr. Akins, the Court finds that two separate incidents occurred where Mr. Thacker ran into a coworker on the stairs on August 21. In one incident, he ran into Mr. Akins, and in another incident with another worker, he scratched his leg and notified his boss, who told him to rest.

2 567 Partners pointed to other causes of Mr. Thacker’s injury, including a fall from a porch at home and poking himself with a knife at work. The Court finds that the incident where he poked himself with a knife happened, as the witnesses testified.

When Mr. Thacker gave Dr. Lord the history of the accident, Dr. Lord gave an opinion that the injury and need for treatment were caused by the bump on the stairs. This is the only medical opinion in the record. No one asked Dr. Lord about the knife and cola alleged incident. The Court cannot speculate whether Dr. Lord’s opinion would change based on this information. So, Mr. Thacker is likely to succeed at a hearing in proving his entitlement to medical benefits.

Because 567 Partners failed to provide medical benefits, the Court designates Dr. Lord as his authorized treating physician. Blevins v. S. Champion Tray, LP, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *16-17 (July 11, 2019). 567 Partners shall arrange appointments with Dr. Lord and pay for his treatment.

Mr. Thacker also requested temporary disability benefits. To receive them, he must prove (1) total disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Constr. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Other than he has not worked, he offered no proof on these requirements, and his request is denied.

The Court reserves the issue of attorney fees. Although Mr. Thacker is successful currently in showing he is likely to succeed at a hearing on the merits about medical benefits, awarding attorney fees at this early stage is not supported by the facts. Andrew v. Yates Servs., LLC, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *12 (May 8, 2018).

It is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. 567 Partners and its carrier must provide Mr. Thacker medical treatment with Dr. Kent Lord and provide any reasonable and necessary medical treatment under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 204(a)(1)(A).

2. Mr. Thacker’s requests for payment of temporary disability benefits and attorney fees are denied at this time.

3 3. The Court sets a status hearing on September 30, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern. The parties must dial 855-543-5044 to participate.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the expedited order is filed, compliance with this order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 239(d)(3).

ENTERED July 14, 2026.

Brian K. Addington ____________________________________ JUDGE BRIAN K. ADDINGTON Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

Appendix

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Ballard Thacker 2. Deposition of Dr. Kent Lord 3. Wage Statement 4. Texts (for identification only).1

1 The Court did not admit these into evidence as business records because Mr. Thacker’s recollection of events after his injury is poor. 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as shown on July 14, 2026.

Name Email Service sent to: Todd East, X todd@toddeast.com Employee’s Attorney jennifer@toddeast.com Richard Clark, X rclark@eraclides.com Employer’s Attorney jenniferdavis@eraclides.com

____________________________________ PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

5 Right to Appeal: If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
THACKER, BALLARD v. 567 PARTNERS, INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thacker-ballard-v-567-partners-inc-tennworkcompcl-2026.