Thabault v. Ashcroft

85 F. App'x 257
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 2004
DocketNo. 03-6127
StatusPublished

This text of 85 F. App'x 257 (Thabault v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thabault v. Ashcroft, 85 F. App'x 257 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

[258]*258SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Louis Thabault appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (J. Gar-van Murtha, Judge) dismissing his action against Attorney General John Ashcroft seeking to compel the Attorney General to prosecute telephone companies who provide service to off-shore gambling houses.

The District Court dismissed Thabault’s complaint on the ground that Thabault lacked standing to bring his claim. We perceive no error in that decision.

We have considered all of plaintiff’s claims on appeal and we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court substantially for the reasons stated by the Court in its Opinion and Order entered May 3, 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 F. App'x 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thabault-v-ashcroft-ca2-2004.