Home/Supreme Court/Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

522 U.S. 1088, 118 S. Ct. 878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 U.S. 653 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 26, 1998·No. No. 97-463·Published

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 979.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, 522 U.S. 1088, 118 S. Ct. 878 (1998).

522 U.S. 1088 (Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.