Textron, Inc. v. Froelich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Textron, Inc. v. Froelich

279 A.2d 260, 218 Pa. Super. 924

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Textron, Inc. v. Froelich. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 Pa. Super. 506 →

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 30, 1971·No. Appeal, No. 275·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

And Now, this 30th day of June, 1971, it appearing that the court en banc of the [925]*925lower court which heard the argument on the exceptions filed to the trial court’s order consisted of two judges who were divided in their opinion, the order of the lower court is vacated and the case is remanded to the lower court for reargument and reconsideration before a court en banc properly constituted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam:

And Now, this 30th day of June, 1971, it appearing that the court en banc of the [925]*925lower court which heard the argument on the exceptions filed to the trial court’s order consisted of two judges who were divided in their opinion, the order of the lower court is vacated and the case is remanded to the lower court for reargument and reconsideration before a court en banc properly constituted.

Textron, Inc. v. Froelich, 279 A.2d 260, 218 Pa. Super. 924 (Pa. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

279 A.2d 260 (Textron, Inc. v. Froelich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.