Texports Stevedore Company v. Winchester
This text of 569 F.2d 428 (Texports Stevedore Company v. Winchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXPORTS STEVEDORE COMPANY, and Texas Employers' Insurance
Association, Petitioners,
v.
Murl J. WINCHESTER and Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor,
Respondents.
No. 76-4100.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 23, 1978.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board (Texas case).
E. D. Vickery, W. Robins Brice, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.
Alfred G. Albert, Acting Sol., Laurie M. Streeter, Associate Sol. of Labor, Ronald E. Meisburg, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., for Director, Office of Workers' Com. Programs.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion June 20, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 554 F.2d 245).
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, and VANCE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 F.2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texports-stevedore-company-v-winchester-ca5-1978.