Texidor v. Bennett M. Lifter, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Texidor v. Bennett M. Lifter, Inc.

756 So. 2d 224, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2000 WL 482843

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 2000

DocketNo. 3D98-2192

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 756 So. 2d 224 (Texidor v. Bennett M. Lifter, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texidor v. Bennett M. Lifter, Inc., 756 So. 2d 224, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2000 WL 482843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court committed reversible error by deviating from the standard jury instruction. We find that the instruction, as given, served to confuse or mislead the jury. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Florida Power & Light Co. v. McCollum, 140 So.2d 569 (Fla.1962). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial with instructions to use the standard jury instructions without modification.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court committed reversible error by deviating from the standard jury instruction. We find that the instruction, as given, served to confuse or mislead the jury. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Florida Power & Light Co. v. McCollum, 140 So.2d 569 (Fla.1962). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial with instructions to use the standard jury instructions without modification.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

756 So. 2d 224, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, 2000 WL 482843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texidor-v-bennett-m-lifter-inc-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack