Texido v. Waters of Orchard Park
300 A.D.2d 1150, 755 N.Y.S.2d 348
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Motion to vacate dismissal granted on condition that appeal perfected on or before January 3, 2003. Memorandum: In the absence of any indication that defendants were misled or prejudiced, the notice of appeal is deemed amended to correct the name of appellant (see Waters of White Lake v Fricke, 276 App Div 628, 628-629). Present — Hayes, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ. (Filed Dec. 5, 2002.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Texido v. Waters of Orchard Park, 300 A.D.2d 1150, 755 N.Y.S.2d 348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
300 A.D.2d 1150 (Texido v. Waters of Orchard Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peterson v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2019 NY Slip Op 5853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)