Texido v. Waters of Orchard Park

300 A.D.2d 1150, 755 N.Y.S.2d 348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 300 A.D.2d 1150 (Texido v. Waters of Orchard Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texido v. Waters of Orchard Park, 300 A.D.2d 1150, 755 N.Y.S.2d 348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Motion to vacate dismissal granted on condition that appeal perfected on or before January 3, 2003. Memorandum: In the absence of any indication that defendants were misled or prejudiced, the notice of appeal is deemed amended to correct the name of appellant (see Waters of White Lake v Fricke, 276 App Div 628, 628-629). Present — Hayes, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ. (Filed Dec. 5, 2002.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peterson v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2019 NY Slip Op 5853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 1150, 755 N.Y.S.2d 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texido-v-waters-of-orchard-park-nyappdiv-2002.