Texas Vein and Vascular, TVV Medispa, and Javier Alonso M.D. v. Mary Martinez
This text of Texas Vein and Vascular, TVV Medispa, and Javier Alonso M.D. v. Mary Martinez (Texas Vein and Vascular, TVV Medispa, and Javier Alonso M.D. v. Mary Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13-14-00176-CV
Texas Vein and Vascular, TVV Medispa, and Javier Alonso M.D. v. Mary Martinez
On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas Trial Cause No. 2013-DCV-4007-A
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED IN PART and
REVERSED IN PART, and the case should be REMANDED IN PART to the trial court.
The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED
IN PART, and the case is REMANDED IN PART for further proceedings consistent with
its opinion. Costs of the appeal are taxed to the party incurring same.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
September 3, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Texas Vein and Vascular, TVV Medispa, and Javier Alonso M.D. v. Mary Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-vein-and-vascular-tvv-medispa-and-javier-alonso-md-v-mary-texapp-2015.