Texas v. United States

279 F.R.D. 176, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81473, 2012 WL 1578390
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 6, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 11-1303·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

This Court held a telephone status conference with the parties in this matter on January 6, 2012 in which the State of Texas represented that in light of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on January 2, 2012, Dkt. ## 128, 129, it had obtained waivers from relevant members of the Texas State Legislature regarding any alleged attorney-client relationship they may have with the Texas Legislative Council. Texas will produce discovery pursuant to this waiver and asks the Court to vacate the portion of its Opinion relating to the existence of a privileged relationship between the Texas Legislative Council and members of the Texas State Legislature. The Defendants have no objection to such a vacatur. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the portion of the Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. # 128, relating to the existence of an attorney-client relationship between the Texas Legislative Council and members of the Texas State Legislature is VACATED.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Texas v. United States, 279 F.R.D. 176, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81473, 2012 WL 1578390 (D.D.C. 2012).

279 F.R.D. 176 (Texas v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Favors v. Cuomo
285 F.R.D. 187 (E.D. New York, 2012)