Texas v. United States

279 F.R.D. 176, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81473, 2012 WL 1578390
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 6, 2012
DocketCivil Action No. 11-1303
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 F.R.D. 176 (Texas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas v. United States, 279 F.R.D. 176, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81473, 2012 WL 1578390 (D.D.C. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

This Court held a telephone status conference with the parties in this matter on January 6, 2012 in which the State of Texas represented that in light of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on January 2, 2012, Dkt. ## 128, 129, it had obtained waivers from relevant members of the Texas State Legislature regarding any alleged attorney-client relationship they may have with the Texas Legislative Council. Texas will produce discovery pursuant to this waiver and asks the Court to vacate the portion of its Opinion relating to the existence of a privileged relationship between the Texas Legislative Council and members of the Texas State Legislature. The Defendants have no objection to such a vacatur. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the portion of the Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. # 128, relating to the existence of an attorney-client relationship between the Texas Legislative Council and members of the Texas State Legislature is VACATED.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Favors v. Cuomo
285 F.R.D. 187 (E.D. New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 F.R.D. 176, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81473, 2012 WL 1578390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-v-united-states-dcd-2012.