Texas & Pacific R'y v. McKenzie
This text of 2 Posey 307 (Texas & Pacific R'y v. McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion.— The proof supports the allegations of appellee. Held, on the subject of the duty of appellant to the appellee in this case, the court correctly gave the following charge: “It was the duty of the defendant, at said station where it received passengers, to have and keep in reasonably safe condition suitable approaches to and from its cars to its station-house, and at night-time} if needed, to have sufficient light to enable passengers who might wish to take passage on night trains to pass with safety from the station-house to the trains.” I. & G. N. R. R. v. Stewart, 57 Tex., 166; McKone v. M. C. R. R., 13 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 29 and note; Whart. on Neg., secs. 653, 821.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Posey 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-pacific-ry-v-mckenzie-texcommnapp-1885.