Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Hudel

329 F.2d 95
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 1964
Docket21013
StatusPublished

This text of 329 F.2d 95 (Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Hudel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Hudel, 329 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

329 F.2d 95

The TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Mrs. Chestella Alvis HUDEL, Individually and as natural tutrix of the minors, Mary Ann Hudel, Nancy Jane Hudel and Joan Theresa Hudel, et al., Appellees.

No. 21013.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 12, 1964.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1964.

Maurice J. Wilson, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant, The Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

David W. Robinson, Horace C. Lane, Watson, Blanche, Wilson, Posner & Thibaut, Baton Rouge, La., for appellee, Mrs. Chestella Alvis Hudel.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find the appellant negligent in relation to the maintenance of the crossing at which the accident occurred. The question of the contributory negligence of the decedent presented fact issues which were resolved by the jury. Finding no error in the charge, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 F.2d 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-pacific-railway-company-v-hudel-ca5-1964.