Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hudel

Fifth Circuit

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hudel

329 F.2d 95

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 1964

DocketNo. 21013

StatusPublished

This text of 329 F.2d 95 (Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hudel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hudel, 329 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find the appellant negligent in relation to the maintenance of the crossing at which the accident occurred. The question of the contributory negligence of the decedent presented fact issues which were resolved by the jury. Finding no error in the charge, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find the appellant negligent in relation to the maintenance of the crossing at which the accident occurred. The question of the contributory negligence of the decedent presented fact issues which were resolved by the jury. Finding no error in the charge, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 F.2d 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-pacific-railway-co-v-hudel-ca5-1964.