Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bufkin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bufkin

20 S.W.2d 1119

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedSeptember 20, 1929

DocketNo. 599.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 S.W.2d 1119 (Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bufkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bufkin, 20 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

LESLIE, J.

This is a companion ease to that of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. J. A. Bufkin, decided by this court July 12th, 1929, opinion reported in 19 S.W.(2d) 343. The instant suit grows out of a shipment of live stock over the same carriers, but at a different time, and involves a different time of arrival at destination, but the acts of negligence complained of are substantially the same. A comparison of the records and the briefs in the respective cases discloses that the same propositions of law are advanced by the appellant in each case, and appellee has not answered these propositions by submitting any brief of the questions raised. The controlling propositions were fully discussed in the opinion in the former cáse, and what was there said is equally applicable in the disposition of the questions of law presented here.

For the reasons there assigned for reversing the judgment of the trial court in the earlier case, the judgment of the trial court in the instant case is reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LESLIE, J.

This is a companion ease to that of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. J. A. Bufkin, decided by this court July 12th, 1929, opinion reported in 19 S.W.(2d) 343. The instant suit grows out of a shipment of live stock over the same carriers, but at a different time, and involves a different time of arrival at destination, but the acts of negligence complained of are substantially the same. A comparison of the records and the briefs in the respective cases discloses that the same propositions of law are advanced by the appellant in each case, and appellee has not answered these propositions by submitting any brief of the questions raised. The controlling propositions were fully discussed in the opinion in the former cáse, and what was there said is equally applicable in the disposition of the questions of law presented here.

For the reasons there assigned for reversing the judgment of the trial court in the earlier case, the judgment of the trial court in the instant case is reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial. It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.W.2d 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-pacific-railway-co-v-bufkin-texapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack