Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Stevens

173 S.W. 629, 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 17
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 21, 1915·No. No. 1391.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HODGES, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover damages in the sum of $250, alleged to be the value of an animal injured in a collision with one of appellant’s trains. The facts show that the animal was killed in the corporate limits of the city of Bonham, near the passenger depot. After a trial before a jury, a judgment was rendered in the appellee’s favor for $200.

Appellant insists that the testimony was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment, and that the court should have giveu a peremptory instruction directing a verdict for the appellant. We have carefully examined the evidence, and think the assignment should be overruled. There was evidence upon which the jury might base a finding of the negligence alleged.

The remaining assignments of error are without merit, and are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Stevens, 173 S.W. 629, 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 17 (Tex. Ct. App. 1915).

173 S.W. 629 (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Niles
255 S.W. 604 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1923)
Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Village Mills Co.
241 S.W. 122 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1922)