Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Stevens

173 S.W. 629, 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 17
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 1915
DocketNo. 1391.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 173 S.W. 629 (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Stevens, 173 S.W. 629, 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 17 (Tex. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

HODGES, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover damages in the sum of $250, alleged to be the value of an animal injured in a collision with one of appellant’s trains. The facts show that the animal was killed in the corporate limits of the city of Bonham, near the passenger depot. After a trial before a jury, a judgment was rendered in the appellee’s favor for $200.

Appellant insists that the testimony was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment, and that the court should have giveu a peremptory instruction directing a verdict for the appellant. We have carefully examined the evidence, and think the assignment should be overruled. There was evidence upon which the jury might base a finding of the negligence alleged.

The remaining assignments of error are without merit, and are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Niles
255 S.W. 604 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1923)
Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Village Mills Co.
241 S.W. 122 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 S.W. 629, 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-p-ry-co-v-stevens-texapp-1915.