Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Reiss
99 F. 1006, 39 C.C.A. 680, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4222
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 1900
DocketNo. 150
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 99 F. 1006 (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Reiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Reiss, 99 F. 1006, 39 C.C.A. 680, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4222 (2d Cir. 1900).
Opinion
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Rush Taggart, for plaintiff in error. Treadwell Cleveland, for defendants in error. Before WALLACE and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges. No opinion. Judgment affirmed on the opinion in the former appeal. 98 Fed. 533.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Coutourie
135 F. 465 (Second Circuit, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 F. 1006, 39 C.C.A. 680, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-p-ry-co-v-reiss-ca2-1900.