Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.

Fifth Circuit

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.

218 F. 990, 133 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1614

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 6, 1915·No. No. 2678·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think it follows, from the decision in the companion case of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rosborough, Home Insurance Company, North British & Mercantile Company, et al. (December 14, 1914) 235 U. S. 429, 35 Sup. Ct. 117, 59 L. Ed. -, that there was no reversible error in the-rulings in this case Which are urged as groupds for a reversal, and that the judgment should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think it follows, from the decision in the companion case of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rosborough, Home Insurance Company, North British & Mercantile Company, et al. (December 14, 1914) 235 U. S. 429, 35 Sup. Ct. 117, 59 L. Ed. -, that there was no reversible error in the-rulings in this case Which are urged as groupds for a reversal, and that the judgment should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins., 218 F. 990, 133 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1614 (5th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

218 F. 990 (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.