Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.

Fifth Circuit

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.

218 F. 990, 133 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1614

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 6, 1915

DocketNo. 2678

StatusPublished

This text of 218 F. 990 (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins., 218 F. 990, 133 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1614 (5th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think it follows, from the decision in the companion case of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rosborough, Home Insurance Company, North British & Mercantile Company, et al. (December 14, 1914) 235 U. S. 429, 35 Sup. Ct. 117, 59 L. Ed. -, that there was no reversible error in the-rulings in this case Which are urged as groupds for a reversal, and that the judgment should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think it follows, from the decision in the companion case of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rosborough, Home Insurance Company, North British & Mercantile Company, et al. (December 14, 1914) 235 U. S. 429, 35 Sup. Ct. 117, 59 L. Ed. -, that there was no reversible error in the-rulings in this case Which are urged as groupds for a reversal, and that the judgment should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 F. 990, 133 C.C.A. 673, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-p-ry-co-v-hartford-fire-ins-ca5-1915.