Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Elder-Dempster Shipping, Ltd.

174 F. 1022, 98 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5144
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1910
DocketNo. 1,899
StatusPublished

This text of 174 F. 1022 (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Elder-Dempster Shipping, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Elder-Dempster Shipping, Ltd., 174 F. 1022, 98 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5144 (5th Cir. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the collision of the steamship Monarch and the transfer boat L. S. Thome, both vessels were unquestionably in fault. The Monarch was in fault in not sooner observing the Thorne, ¡which, was well -lighted up, and whose port light showed on her starboard bow, and then in not com-, plying with the starboard rule. The L. S. Thorne was in fault in not renewing her signal of leaving her dock -after the Corsair passed down, and in not-keeping a competent lookout, whereby the Monarch would have been sooner seen, her signals heard and answered, and a -collision probably avoided. In the peculiar state of the pleadings and proof, the court below properly refused demurrage to both parties. We think the decree appealed from does substantial justice between the parties, and it is therefore affirmed. The costs of this court to be divided. . ' •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 F. 1022, 98 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-p-ry-co-v-elder-dempster-shipping-ltd-ca5-1910.