Texas & P. R. v. Bloom

Fifth Circuit

Texas & P. R. v. Bloom

60 F. 979, 9 C.C.A. 300, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2146

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 30, 1894·No. No. 191·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McCOBMICK, Circuit Judge.

The motion of the defendant to dismiss this writ of error we do not consider well taken, and it is refused.

The substantial issues pressed by the plaintiff in error have been fully litigated by it in recent cases in the state courts. Railway Co. v. Johnson, 76 Tex. 421, 13 S. W. 463; Railway Co. v. Overheiser, 76 Tex. 437, 13 S. W. 468; Railway Co. v. Griffin, 76 Tex. 441, 13 S. W. 471. On the authority of these cases, as affirmed by the supreme court of the United States in Railway Co. v. Johnson, in their opinion delivered January 3, 1894 (14 Sup. Ct. 250), the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCOBMICK, Circuit Judge.

The motion of the defendant to dismiss this writ of error we do not consider well taken, and it is refused.

The substantial issues pressed by the plaintiff in error have been fully litigated by it in recent cases in the state courts. Railway Co. v. Johnson, 76 Tex. 421, 13 S. W. 463; Railway Co. v. Overheiser, 76 Tex. 437, 13 S. W. 468; Railway Co. v. Griffin, 76 Tex. 441, 13 S. W. 471. On the authority of these cases, as affirmed by the supreme court of the United States in Railway Co. v. Johnson, in their opinion delivered January 3, 1894 (14 Sup. Ct. 250), the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Texas & P. R. v. Bloom, 60 F. 979, 9 C.C.A. 300, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2146 (5th Cir. 1894).

Pincite

60 F. 979 (Texas & P. R. v. Bloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related